Friday, March 16, 2012

Mirrors in History


            Throughout the world, stories of conquest and independence have paralleled each other. European conquerors craved power, whether it was economic, religious, political, or geographical. As a result, they subjugated the natives of the conquered countries to work for the Europeans’ profit. Angered natives then revolted and fought for their independence. In various stories of conquest and subsequent freedom, various countries have mirrored desire for power, strict methods of control, and struggles for independence.

            Many European nations shared a desire for trade power, religious power, political power, and land, which led to rapid colonization. In both Zimbabwe and India, Britain conquered the natives initially in order to establish a trade connection; therefore, trade companies such as the British South Africa Company and the British East India Company controlled the natives at first through negotiating alliances with local leaders. However, when the trade companies could not keep control of the rebellious natives, the British crown stepped in and set up a stricter government. Similarly, at the beginning of Spanish rule in the Philippines, feudal-style tax farmers called encomenderos were supposed to collect profits from native farmers and the spice trade and educate the locals in Christianity. When the encomenderos neglected their religious responsibilities and withheld profits from the Spanish crown, the king took control and appointed his own governors. Additionally, in Brazil and Mexico, various Spanish conquistadores, such as Hernan Cortez, took on the white man’s burden and attempted to spread Christianity. In the Scramble for Africa, various European nations fought for a hold on the resources and political power to be gained from colonizing Africa. While the British held control of Zimbabwe, Belgium subjugated Africans in the Congo for profit from rubber latex, one of many cash crops. 

            The nature of foreign rule forced European nations to use extreme tactics in order to keep control of and gain profit from their distant colonies. In the Congo, King Leopold II resorted to severe military tactics to force the Africans there to harvest rubber latex like slaves. Additionally, in Vietnam, the French enforced a centralized government with heavy taxes and forced labor. Another instance of this slave labor occurred in Haiti, where the French recruited not only Haitians, but also Africans, to work on sugar plantations. Many of these slaves died from injuries and malnutrition, but the rapid production of sugar eventually stripped Haiti of its fertile land and natural resources. Spain also enforced a strict labor system in gold and silver mines in the Dominican Republic. Many workers died from European diseases and abuse. Ironically, because the methods Europeans used to manage their colonies were at times so strict, locals were more rebellious and more inclined to revolt. 

            Many conquered civilizations gained independence through revolts and wars with support from active political groups. In India, which later split into India and Pakistan, the Indian National Congress and the All-India Muslim League shared a mutual desire for independence, but while the Indian National Congress wanted a single combined nation, the All-India Muslim League pushed for a separate Muslim nation. The Partition of India created two separate nations that were split by religion. Likewise, the Zimbabwe African National Union advocated freedom through military means, and the Zimbabwe African People’s Union sought foreign help. However, eventually, both groups came together to achieve independence. In many other nations, including Afghanistan, Vietnam, the Dominican Republic, and the Philippines, natives struggled with their rulers in various wars. 

            Even halfway across the world, civilizations mirrored each other in their aspiration for dominance, severe forms of government, and difficult fights for independence. After they gained independence, these new civilizations branched off into their own forms and ideas; however, there is no doubt that their conquerors indelibly influenced them. Whether in language, technology, architecture, or art, visitors to any country today can see influences from nations across the world that have converged in one place. History is full of mirrors and parallels, not only in events, but also in its effects on the modern world.

           

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

History In Action

Check out these videos about the India Pakistan Partition of 1947!

This is the first part of a 90 minute BBC documentary on the Partition of India. It details not only the British withdrawal from India, but also the causes and consequences of the tension between Hindus and Muslims. This is a great in depth analysis on the results of the Partition of India. 
 
These two videos show the mass exodus of Muslims and Hindus. They portray the severity of the geographical and cultural disconnect among Muslims and Hindus on both sides of the India-Pakistan border. During the migration from India to Pakistan or vice versa, brutal violence caused the deaths of many civilians.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

What Happened Next?


Partition did not bring immediate peace. At first, the India-Pakistan region was extremely unstable. Northern India divided East and West Pakistan, and as a result, Hindus and Muslims constantly clashed. The geographical divide caused cultural confusion, and crowds of Muslims and Hindus left one country for the other. Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the first governor-general of Pakistan and president of the Assembly, advocated a personal rather than political view of religion as Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims migrated. However, his appeals were unsuccessful, and violence led to countless deaths on both sides of the border. Jinnah died a year after partition, leaving the newly formed Pakistan disorganized. There was no machinery, personnel, or equipment, and among other problems, the first choice for the Pakistani capital was too close to the Pakistan-India border. (A) Early conflicts between Pakistan and India included a trade war involving insufficient supply of goods that ended in complete severance of trade relations between Pakistan and India. (A) Up to 1971, attempts to politically and ethnically unify East and West Pakistan failed due to civil unrest and ineffective leaders. (C) East Pakistan later became Bangladesh, and West Pakistan became modern day Pakistan.

Indian and Pakistani Independence

Britain began to lose control over India in the Uprising of 1857-1858. Members of the British Indian army refused to fight due to the presence of cow and pig fat in guns, and as a result, the British crown took power away from the British East India Company. (A) After the Sepoy Mutiny, which was a result of British expansionism and modernization, Queen Victoria became empress of India. (F) The cultural and political gap between the British and the Indians grew, and the British government forced Indian troops to fight in other nations. Slowly, Indians involved themselves more in government. The Government of India Act of 1919 led to an “increasing association of Indians in every branch of the administration and the gradual development of self-governing institutions with a view to the progressive realization of responsible government in India as an integral part of the British Empire.” (A)

In 1920, after World War I, India was no longer an essential trade market for Britain, and though Britain continued to hold power, it was less invested in Indian affairs. (E) During this time, Indian nationalism also began to grow. Because of less British investment, self-rule expanded, and Indians challenged British authority. New nationalist groups rose from Western education and ideas in the elite class. English speaking Indians who began to organize associations and public meetings formed the Indian National Congress. Mohandas Gandhi, the leader of Congress, focused on the interests of Hindus; as a result, Indian Muslims formed their own group called the All India Muslim League. (F)


During World War II, the Muslim League cooperated with Britain while Congress continued to stage protests. Muslims in the British Indian Army fought alongside Great Britain, which led to British favor and allowed for Muslim leverage in later discussion of independence. (A) On the contrary, as Gandhi continued with his Quit India Movement, the British crown outlawed Congress, and riots increased. (A) The 1945 rise of the British Labor Party led to a greater push for independence from both Hindi and Muslim leaders. Hindus wanted a  combined secular, democratic state, while the Muslims wanted a separate Muslim state. In 1946, as Britain began to withdraw from India, the Hindus did not include the Muslims in plans for the interim government, and Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the first leader of Pakistan, called for a demonstration. Mass communal rioting broke out among Muslims and continued for a year. August 1947 brought the partition of British India into self- governed India and Pakistan. (A, C) 

Colonial Influence Of The British

Two different British powers controlled India. The British East India Company adopted a loose, decentralized form of government. They employed partial decolonization and allowed a certain amount of self-government in some areas while maintaining a small amount of control. (G) Resistance from the Indian National Congress and tension among Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs forced Britain to allow some self-rule. (G) Additionally, the British East India Company focused on trade power rather than political control. However, the British style of rule changed after power went to the British crown. 
 
The British also culturally affected India, and therefore Pakistan. They improved transportation, communication, mines, and irrigation in India in order to facilitate trade, which advanced India technologically. (A) Just as Urdu came with the Mughals, the British brought English to India, and English was the official language of India from 1962 to 1973. (B) English is still widely spoken in India. Additionally, British policies particularly affected Pakistan. In fact, the spread of Western education led to Muslim desire for separation of religious schools from the Hindus. Though the British attempted to divide the Hindus and Muslims in order to conquer them easily, they only succeeded in creating a stronger bond among Muslims, who stubbornly refused to live in a country where Hinduism was the main religion. Therefore, Pakistan traces its existence from British teachings that caused a demand for a new Muslim state. Additionally, the Victorian style of government became a model for Pakistan’s law. (A) Today, many Pakistani descendants of soldiers from the British Indian Army live in the United Kingdom. (B) The presence of Great Britain in India not only affected India, but also shaped the policies of modern-day Pakistan.

Shift of Power

The period of the Mughals ended in 1757, when the British defeated the Mughal army in Bengal, beginning British rule in India (A). The British East India Company utilized military and political control as two means of acquiring trade power (B). In most of northern India, the British gained control through direct military conquest; in other parts of India, the British set up “subsidiary agreements (sanad) between the British and the local rulers, under which control of foreign affairs, defense, and communications was transferred from the ruler to the company and rulers were allowed to rule as they wished (up to a limit) on other matters.” (A) The British secured their control in 1765 when they defeated Shah Alam II and forced him to be the collector of revenue for the British East India Company, effectively putting the British in power (A). The conquest of India by the British would have been impossible without the efforts of Robert Clive, the mastermind of this takeover (F). 

map of British India in 1947 showing majority religions

 The British East India Company remained in control for a century with a focus on trade domination.

The Time of the Mughals

Before Pakistan existed, it was part of India. The Mughals, who were led by Babur, first conquered India in 1526 (A). Akbar and Shah Jahan later solidified the Mughal rule. The Mughals influenced Indian, and later Pakistani, culture greatly. The Mughals brought with them Urdu, the official language of Pakistan, which was not indigenous to the area (D). The Mughals also brought with them Persian influences; Humayun encouraged Persian language and art, including carpet-making, architecture, pottery, and jewelry (B). Visitors to Pakistan can still see these influences today in the famed Taj Mahal, which was built by Shah Jahan. In addition to the magnificent Taj Mahal, Pakistan houses many elaborate palaces, mosques, fortresses, and gardens that were built using Mughal influences (F). 

 













 Most importantly, the Mughals brought the religion of Islam to the area, which competed with Hinduism and is the very reason for Pakistan’s creation. However, the Mughals did not rule for long before a new power came into the picture and took control of India.